Home >

Brand Clothing "Fashion Poison" Openly, Who Should Be Ashamed?

2011/8/27 16:24:00 43

A month ago, a report released that Nike, Adidas, Lining and other well-known sports brand clothing suppliers to the environment of the Chinese river to discharge the environment

Hormones

23 days later, environmental protection organization Greenpeace released its latest survey report. It said Nike, ADI, Lining and other international and domestic famous brand products contained "environmental hormones", which had an impact on the biological development of organisms.

Although toxic clothing is not new, it has long existed, but the world-famous clothing brand "

Poisoning

Many people have heard about it for the first time.

This may indicate that the well-known clothing brand suppliers and products at the forefront of fashion are not toxic but not toxic.

It can be seen that consumers are obsessed with some famous brands with high consumption costs, but they do not understand the toxicity of well-known brand products.

Grief

Things.

In addition to being disappointing, it is also very puzzling.

These brand clothing suppliers discharge toxic substances to rivers and lakes. Why did the environmental protection departments fail to discover them in time, but the public welfare organizations - Greenpeace discovery? Is this because the environmental protection department is making a blind eye, or is it because many heavy polluting enterprises are more toxic than clothing enterprises, and do not supervise the clothing enterprises? Or because our testing standards are too low?

It is obvious that the poison of clothing or the poison of fashion is announced by a public welfare organization, not by government departments.

Testing

And announces, to a certain extent, that the relevant departments do not act.

All kinds of pollution incidents are frequent, and some local environmental protection departments have been exposed. Today, clothing enterprises are also detoxifying, which is another evidence of environmental protection departments' omission.

I think, facing the "fashion poison - the global clothing brand China water pollution investigation" report, the relevant departments need to review and reflect.

Similarly, the green peace released report, clothing quality inspection departments, quality inspection standards departments should also ask themselves.

At present, only the individual enterprises make a commitment to "detoxification" in the list of green peace announces. Most enterprises remain silent or denied.

I think it is worth noting that enterprises undertaking commitments can be fulfilled. For enterprises that do not "poison" commitment and denial, they need supervision by public opinion, and the relevant regulatory departments should be "bright sword". Otherwise, these well-known garment enterprises may not regard environmental protection and public health as their eyes.

In my view, the healthy development of society can never rely on public welfare agencies such as Greenpeace to promote and maintain it alone. Instead, it is necessary to form a situation in which government supervision takes the lead, social supervision, public opinion supervision and public welfare organizations jointly promote the healthy development of society.

But the reality is that government regulation tends to lag behind, and many times.

Supervision by public opinion

The public welfare organizations play a leading role in maintaining social health. This does not seem normal. It is worth our deep reflection.