Shoe Factory Employees Fined 6000 Yuan For Stealing 2 Pairs Of Shoes, Lack Of Legal Basis For Shoe Factory Fines

< p > Guizhou people Huang Mou in Putian Xiuyu Industrial Park, a a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_x.asp" > shoe factory < /a > work, because steal factory 2 pairs of shoes, the factory fined 6000 yuan. Because of this, Huang was also detained by the police and was expelled from the factory. Huang felt that the penalty was unreasonable and brought the factory to court. 25, the reporter learned from the Xiuyu District Court of Putian that the court heard the case recently, and found that the 6000 yuan collected by the factory lacked legal basis and should be returned to Hwang immediately. < /p >
< p > < strong > either pay the penalty or enter the police station < /strong > < /p >.
< p > according to the judge, in March 17th this year, when Huang worked in a shoe factory, he had stolen two pairs of shoes (assessed by the public security department for 434 yuan) while people were not paying attention. Unexpectedly, Huang had just walked out of the factory door and was found by the security guard in his bag. After knowing the matter, the shoe factory told Huang that he would pay 6000 yuan or go to the police station. < /p >
Huang P was very depressed after he paid a fine of 6000 yuan, because it was equivalent to two months he spent on shoe factories. When he was having lunch with a workmate, he felt that he had been drinking after drinking. Soon, Hwang's a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > steal shoes < /a > was spread around the factory, and the workers were talking about it. When the factory was under pressure, Huang told the police about theft. In the end, Huang was arrested for 7 days, and the shoe factory also fired Huang in accordance with the contract. < /p >
< p > < strong > shoe factory fines 6000, lack of legal basis < /strong > < /p >
After P came out of the detention center, Huang believed that the shoe factory did not comply with its promise and had no right to impose a fine on it, requiring the shoe factory to repay the money. However, the shoe factory only issued a receipt to Hwang, refusing to refund the fine. After being refused, Huang took the shoe factory to court in May 16th. < /p >
< p > judge told reporters that in the court, the shoe factory argued that Huang had stolen shoes and fined 6000 yuan, which was a voluntary compensation to Huang's factory. The court heard that the shoe factory charged 6000 yuan to Huang and lacked the legal basis. Recently, the court decided that the shoe factory should return Hwang 6000 yuan immediately. < /p >
< p > reporter has learned that many companies will set up some fine regulations, such as late penalty, early retirement, penalty and so on. However, the judge told reporters that these fines were actually not legal. The law did not stipulate that enterprises had < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_q.asp" > fines > /a > rights. Therefore, enterprises have no right to make rules and regulations that contain fines. In this case, although Huang had stolen shoes, the shoe factory was not entitled to fines, and failed to provide evidence to prove that the factory suffered economic losses. < /p >